Tennessee Teachers Get to Play the Odds in the Evaluation Game

I will preface this post for anyone that is not aware. I taught high school math in Nashville, Tennessee for the last two years in the public school system. 

Tennessee is implementing a new teacher evaluation system this year. A NY Times article titled In Tennessee, Following the Rules for Evaluations Off a Cliff discusses the shortfalls of the new teacher evaluation system. I am aware of the challenge of measuring student achievement in classes like art, band, dance, and other subjects that don't have state tests, but this part surprised me:

For 15 percent of their testing evaluation, teachers without [test] scores are permitted to choose which subject test they want to be judged on. Few pick something related to their expertise; instead, they try to anticipate the subject that their school is likely to score well on in the state exams next spring. 

And more...

It’s a bit like Vegas, and if you pick the wrong academic subject, you lose and get a bad evaluation. While this may have nothing to do with academic performance, it does measure a teacher’s ability to play the odds. 

Although a learning curve is to be expected for states implementing new evaluation systems, allowing teachers of non-tested subjects choose which subject test they will be judged on is just a horrible idea. This blatantly bad policy needs to be scrapped, and the state department needs to go back to the drawing board. Why evaluate teachers on how their students do in ANOTHER subject? They have less incentive to teach THEIR subject well.

Sidenote: I am glad I'm not teaching right now in TN.

HT M.S.

Forgiving Student Loan Debt - A Good Or Bad Idea?

This idea has been floating around the internet for a couple of months. My thoughts? One of the worst ideas ever. Although I have a pile of student loans myself, and I would benefit greatly from a policy like this, I can see how inane this idea actually is. Here is Justin Wolfers on why this idea sucks.



Addendum: I found this piece from the Economist discussing student loan forgiveness.

Many of the anti-Wall Street protesters push the idea of blanket debt forgiveness as a solution. But that is the wrong answer. Higher education is not a guarantee of employment, but it improves the odds immensely. Unemployment rates among university graduates stood at 4.4% on average across OECD countries in 2009. People who did not complete secondary school faced unemployment rates of 11.5%. Much of the debt that students are taking on is provided or guaranteed by the government. Imposing write-offs on all taxpayers to benefit those with the best job prospects is unfair; and ripping up contracts between borrowers and private lenders is usually a bad idea.

I could not agree more. The article goes on to discuss why student loan laws need to be changed in order to ease the burden of student loans in times of economic crisis.